Detailed Analysis of New Zealand's Victory Over South Africa in the ICC Women's T20 World Cup Final, 2024 Score Analysis Singles (1S): Both teams recorded 52 singles, showing their consistent effort to rotate the strike and keep the runs ticking. 2s/3s: South Africa recorded 13 doubles/triples, while New Zealand had 18, indicating a more aggressive approach from New Zealand in taking multiple runs. 4s (Boundaries): New Zealand hit 12 boundaries compared to South Africa's 10, demonstrating a more attacking batting approach. 6s (Sixes): New Zealand recorded one six, while South Africa had none. This hints at New Zealand’s edge in power hitting. Field Analysis (Spider) Midwicket: Shots towards the midwicket were frequent for both teams. Notably, New Zealand had 67 shots here, significantly more than South Africa's 50. This suggests New Zealand focused on a strong offensive strategy in this region. Other Areas: Both teams registered similar numbers in the covers (15 each) and mid-on (South Africa 16, New Zealand 18). The balanced distribution of shots across the field implies that both teams aimed for a well-rounded batting approach. Wicket Analysis (Manhattan) South Africa’s Wickets: South Africa lost wickets in overs 7, 10, 12, 13, 16, 17, and 19. The frequent loss of wickets, especially from the 13th over onward, likely added pressure, leading to a higher run rate. New Zealand’s Wickets: New Zealand lost wickets in overs 2, 8, 11, and 18, indicating a relatively stable batting performance with fewer interruptions. Batting Strike Rate (S/R) New Zealand: Maddy Green had a strike rate of 200, showcasing an exceptional performance. Brooke Halliday (135.71) and Georgia Plimmer (128.57) also maintained high strike rates, indicating an effective batting lineup. South Africa: Laura Wolvaardt (122.22) and Annerie Dercksen (111.11) showed stability but at a slightly lower strike rate compared to New Zealand’s top batters. Sinalo Jafta achieved a strike rate of 150.00, marking her as a standout performer for South Africa. However, other players didn’t match her impact. Conclusion New Zealand leveraged powerful batting, particularly through midwicket shots and high strike rates, to maintain an edge over South Africa. South Africa did show resilience, but the frequent loss of wickets proved costly, likely tipping the balance in New Zealand’s favor. Bowler Analysis (Overs, Maidens, Runs, Wickets, Economy) South Africa Kapp: Bowled 4 overs with an economy rate of 6.25, conceding 25 runs without taking a wicket. While economical, the lack of wickets failed to pressure the opposing batters. Kahka: Conceded 44 runs in 4 overs with an economy rate of 11.00, despite taking one wicket. The high economy rate indicates she allowed substantial scoring opportunities. Tryon: Bowled 4 overs for 22 runs, with an economy of 5.50 and one wicket. A steady and controlled bowling performance. Mlaba: With 4 overs, 31 runs, and an economy of 7.75, she took two wickets, balancing containment with wicket-taking. Klerk & Luus: Each bowled 2 overs with an economy rate of 8.50. Klerk managed to take one wicket but had limited bowling time. New Zealand Mair: Claimed 3 wickets while conceding 25 runs over 4 overs, with an economy rate of 6.25. Her performance was crucial in restricting South Africa’s score. Carson: Conceded 22 runs in 4 overs with an economy rate of 5.50 and one wicket, showing consistent and effective bowling. Jonas: Bowled 4 overs, conceding 28 runs with an economy rate of 7.00, though without taking a wicket. Her performance helped contain runs despite the lack of wickets. Tahulu: Bowled 3 overs for 21 runs, with an economy rate of 7.00 and 3 wickets, proving effective in limited bowling time. Kerry & Halliday: Kerry bowled 4 overs, conceding 24 runs with one wicket and an economy rate of 6.00. Halliday’s 1-over spell yielded 0 runs, maintaining an economy rate of 4.00. Summary and Analysis Wicket-taking: Mair and Tahulu were standout performers for New Zealand, with their wickets contributing significantly to their team's advantage. South Africa’s bowlers, despite Mlaba’s efforts, couldn’t match New Zealand’s wicket-taking impact. Economy Rate: Kahka’s high economy rate of 11.00 proved costly for South Africa, whereas New Zealand bowlers like Carson and Mair managed to keep their rates within a manageable range (5.50–6.25), maintaining pressure on the opposing side. Performance Review: Mair’s three wickets and Tahulu’s three wickets heavily influenced the match’s momentum, showing New Zealand’s bowlers outperformed South Africa’s in key areas.
Detailed Analysis of New Zealand's Victory Over South Africa in the ICC Women's T20 World Cup Final, 2024 Score Analysis Singles (1S) : Both teams recorded 52 singles, showing their consistent effort to rotate the strike and keep the runs ticking. 2s/3s : South Africa recorded 13 doubles/triples, while New Zealand had 18, indicating a more aggressive approach from New Zealand in taking multiple runs. 4s (Boundaries) : New Zealand hit 12 boundaries compared to South Africa's 10, demonstrating a more attacking batting approach. 6s (Sixes) : New Zealand recorded one six, while South Africa had none. This hints at New Zealand’s edge in power hitting. Field Analysis (Spider) Midwicket : Shots towards the midwicket were frequent for both teams. Notably, New Zealand had 67 shots here, significantly more than South Africa's 50. This suggests New Zealand focused on a strong offensive strategy in this region. Other Areas : Both teams registered similar numbers in the...